http://www.douglaspurdy.com/2008/10/28/oslo-progressive-revelation/ tanto nomini nullum par elogium... Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:42:12 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.douglaspurdy.com/2008/10/28/oslo-progressive-revelation/comment-page-1/#comment-127 William Vambenepe’s blog » Blog Archive » First in-depth look at Microsoft’s Oslo and the “M” modeling language Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:15:53 +0000 http://douglaspurdy.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/oslo-progressive-revelation/#comment-127 [...] And then there is MGrammar. Things get a little confusing at that point if you try to relate MGrammar to “M”. Actually, the FAQ states that “the M language consists of three parts: MGraph, MSchema and MGrammar“. This came a bit as a surprise to me since at that point I had finished reading (not in details but not too quickly either) the “M” documentation and I hadn’t seen these names mentioned once. Looks like there is some documentation consistency issues here, but that’s hardly surprising considering this is a “hyper-early (pre-alpha)” release as Doug Purdy puts it. [...] [...] And then there is MGrammar. Things get a little confusing at that point if you try to relate MGrammar to “M”. Actually, the FAQ states that “the M language consists of three parts: MGraph, MSchema and MGrammar“. This came a bit as a surprise to me since at that point I had finished reading (not in details but not too quickly either) the “M” documentation and I hadn’t seen these names mentioned once. Looks like there is some documentation consistency issues here, but that’s hardly surprising considering this is a “hyper-early (pre-alpha)” release as Doug Purdy puts it. [...]

]]>