<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where is &#8220;Oslo&#8221; going, Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.douglaspurdy.com/2009/04/10/where-is-oslo-going-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.douglaspurdy.com/2009/04/10/where-is-oslo-going-part-iii/</link>
	<description>tanto nomini nullum par elogium...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:42:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe's blog</title>
		<link>http://www.douglaspurdy.com/2009/04/10/where-is-oslo-going-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-4900</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaspurdy.com/2009/04/10/where-is-oslo-going-part-iii/#comment-4900</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;With M (Oslo), is Microsoft on the path to reinventing RDF?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I have given up, at least for now, on understanding what Microsoft wants Oslo (and more specifically the &#8220;M&#8221; part) to be. I used to pull my hair reading inconsistent articles and interviews about what M tries to be (graphical programming! D...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>With M (Oslo), is Microsoft on the path to reinventing RDF?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I have given up, at least for now, on understanding what Microsoft wants Oslo (and more specifically the &#8220;M&#8221; part) to be. I used to pull my hair reading inconsistent articles and interviews about what M tries to be (graphical programming! D&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
